Normalize changing your mind

As we transition to a new presidential administration and a new Congress, I'm thinking about the idea of the circumstances of advocacy changing. 

It's time to kick off the decade of the Green New Deal, time to strengthen global solidarity and decolonize  global health. This is reason enough to sit down and actually have conversations with each other, even the tough ones. It's also time to continue/resume person reflections.

How about changing your mind on a political issue?

A painting my friend made at our Sunrise launch party


For example, over the past year I wondered if I still maintain that climate action has to be bipartisan. Of course, I'd like it to be! But I don't see Republicans taking the climate crisis seriously. We barely see some  Democrats willing to tackle climate justice at the scale we need, based on the science of climate change, the way it intersects with racism and economic inequality, and the urgency of the political moment.

This letter to the editor I wrote in 2019 asserted, "For a climate change solution to be effective — and enacted in the first place — it will have to be bipartisan." At the time, I felt like that was important because I had seen global health legislation passed year after year only because it was bipartisan. If we had a maternal/child health bill, we were so careful to make sure we had a pair of Senators or Representatives enter as cosponsors together so that Democrats and Republicans were as balanced as possible.

I wrote that sentence about bipartisanship before I learned about the Green New Deal and before I joined the Sunrise Movement.

Do I agree with that first sentence today? ... Not really.

The Democratic party now controls the White House, with the ability to tackle climate change through executive action. I wouldn't ever argue that the Biden administration should tone down their approach for the sake of appeasing the Republican party.

Democrats also control the House and the Senate, and I don't have a problem with them using all their influence to pass climate legislation, reduce poverty, and support marginalized communities. In fact, I would encourage it. Go ahead and abolish the filibuster! Just get it done.

Now that I know more about what's in the Green New Deal vision and why it needs to be there, I would urge Democrats to shoot as high as possible instead of settling for a watered-down, ineffective compromise.

So, no. I don't think it's necessary for climate action to be a happy medium between Leftist, Liberal, and Conservative views in order to be effective and get passed. If all these parties could agree that we need to prioritize climate and racial justice, that would be awesome! I do like the idea of working together when we can, and other issues I care about like funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance have enjoyed bipartisan support for years, so that's probably why I'm having trouble letting go of the (admittedly over-optimistic) idea that bipartisanship is always totally possible and will solve all of our problems in a timely manner.

I changed my mind on a political issue. It's not the only time that's happened; just one that I felt comfortable writing about at the moment and specific enough that I can summarize most of that thought process in one short blog post.

It feels pretty weird to be publishing this for everyone to see. These days, it's like we have to have a permanent opinion on everything and be able to hold our own in a debate at any moment. (And I mean everyday life, not just the expected in-class debates of History and English Zooms.) I just wanted to give this example to help normalize changing your mind, or at least being open to the idea that maybe you didn't have it all figured out before, and still don't. I think that's okay. Advocates need to know that's okay, particularly kids and teens because a lot of us are still active with the first organization or campaign we ever joined.

I encourage everyone, as a call to action, to reflect on our capacity to change our minds when we listen to each other. Try to see things from someone else's point of view. Also, know when to stand firm for what you believe in!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to lobby a member of Congress

Image
Lobbying is one of the most intense and effective advocacy actions! And it's no wonder- a face to face conversation with your member of Congress gives both parties the opportunity to be heard and understood, and speak in depth on their positions and room for compromise. There’s an idea many people have in their heads of a cartoonish, fancy-suited man with a briefcase sneaking around Capitol Hill and bribing politicians to represent his interest. I, too, think of that image with extreme distaste. Yes, there are paid lobbyists, but that’s not what I mean by a "lobby meeting" with volunteer constituents . “Lobbying” as a general concept gets its name from people who used to wait around in the lobby of the office building, hoping to snag a few minutes or even precious seconds of a lawmaker’s time to promote their cause. [A panorama taken while my family waited to meet with Senator Blunt. My mom appears three times in the shot, among the crowd waiting in the lobby.] These
Read more

How to Write a Letter to the Editor

Image
What if we could reach a wide audience of fellow constituents and our members of Congress at the same time? Guess what? We can, by writing a short piece for the opinion section of a newspaper called a Letter to the Editor (LTE)! Usually 150-250 words in length, a LTE is another powerful advocacy tool. If you aren’t familiar with what these look like, here are a couple examples I've written about for global health. Lawmakers should help fight a tuberculosis resurgence (September 12, 2022) The Global Fight to End AIDS  (December 7, 2018) See? Pretty short and to the point. Nothing fancy about it, but more credibility and room to develop your ideas than you'd get with a Tweet. LTEs are short enough that you can keep a couple favorites on a cork board Some everyday people will read your letter, though it may not be our peers at school. (There's one teacher at my school who sees my letters in the paper sometimes and talks to me about them, but overall I get the sense that most
Read more

Advocating with a Sensory Processing Disorder

Image
So, I have a sensory processing disorder (SPD), and it makes me really sensitive to touch and sound. Sometimes, this greatly affects what kinds of advocacy actions I can and can’t do, so I wanted to talk a little bit about what having sensory issues means for my experience with advocacy. Like, this school event? (photo is pre-covid) No. absolutely not. Even if we’re not in a pandemic, you will not see me in a crowd like this. [A cheering crowd forming Ws with their fingers runs onto an indoor basketball court, celebrating a win. Signs in the background say "Bomber Territory"- our school's mascot is, unfortunately, a bomber plane.] First, a little explanation if you’re not familiar with my SPD: loud noises, unexpected noises, and certain types of sounds put me in a fight-or-flight state. So does physical contact with other people. Sometimes, I get sensory overloads when it’s all super overwhelming, and my brain feels so scrambled I can’t recognize what’s happening around m
Read more